The Philosophy of Transhumanism as a Revenge of the Ego-cogito

Authors

  • Maria Philatova Kursk State Agricultural Academy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21146/2414-3715-2022-8-2-132-150

Keywords:

the genesis of New European science, the problem of the mathematization of nature, the indivisible unit, the Eleatics, Christianity, the pseudo-unity of the I-cogito, postmodernism, transhumanism, the problem of actual infinity, potential infinity

Abstract

The author of the article contrasts the objection to transhumanism, which proceeds from the fact of success technoscience, with the objection, that takes the very fact of technoscience as a problem. Transhumanism itself gives rise to the problematization of science. It is the top of its development, and at the same time it fits into a single line of continuity of the forms of transformation of human nature known in history, as another, new link of it, following Christianity in this serie. The identification of this kind of "religious" roots of transhumanism brings back the relevance of the problem of the connection between science and Christianity and provides additional resources for reviewing this problem today.

The author of the article shows the connection between the problem of the mathematization (transformation) of nature, known even to the Eleatics, the new possibilities opened for it by Christianity, and the new European tradition of the I-cogito. The Cogito presented itself as a human nature transformed through union with God, as the very unit that Zeno had once sought, but never found. But while posing as something new to western european philosophy and thus defining its development, the cogito was not what it claimed to be. The transition from Descartes' pseudo-discoveries to Zeno's conclusions was inevitable. It has declared itself as a transition from classical epistemology to non-classical epistemology. In view of the fact that non-classics do not just indicate the failure of the classics, but call into question the very possibility of science, two paths open up: the way back or the way forward. The way back brings us back to the problem of the genesis of science, to a radical revision of its possibility. The way forward is the path of transhumanism as a rehabilitation of the pseudo-unity of the I-cogito in the new, extremely favorable conditions, when postmodernism has already abolished the polarization of the top and the bottom, the upper and the lower, that set the problem of unity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Maria Philatova, Kursk State Agricultural Academy

    Ph.D. in Philosophy, lecturer of the Department of Philosophy.

    K. Marx Аve. 70, Kursk, 305021, Russian Federation

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

Issue

Section

Paradoxes of Modern Humanism

How to Cite

1. Philatova M. The Philosophy of Transhumanism as a Revenge of the Ego-cogito // Philosophical anthropology. 2022. № 2 (8). C. 132–150.