Intersubjective Problem of Madness

Authors

  • Olga Tsvetkova RAS Institute of Philosophy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21146/2414-3715-2023-9-1-50-61

Keywords:

Ludwig Binswanger, madness, schizophrenia, world project, Other, We-being, intersubjectivity, intersubjective psychoanalysis, existential psychoanalysis, philosophy of psychiatry

Abstract

The article attempts to consider the phenomenon of madness from the point of view of the problem of intersubjectivity. Ludwig Binswanger’s phenomenological approach to work with schizophrenia, which is a synthesis of phenomenology, ontology and psychoanalysis, was used as a methodological basis. The trend in philosophy and psychological sciences of the 20th–21st centuries of the transition from intrapsychic to intersubjective study of psychopathology is outlined. The concept of L. Binswanger's pathological world-project is presented and L. Binswanger's concept of intersubjectivity is formulated. Madness is defined as the loss of the ability, to a greater or lesser extent, to realize ontological intentionality in intersubjective contact, where the Other appears not as an object, but as a subject. The We-space of intersubjective interaction, is the third entity, constantly formed by the subject and the Other, and also influencing them. This approach forms the basis of L. Binswanger’s psychiatric method, where the possibility of healing madness can arise precisely through the restoration of the ability to subject-subject relationships in intersubjective contact with a therapist.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Olga Tsvetkova, RAS Institute of Philosophy

    Applicant of the Department of the History of Anthropological Doctrines

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

Issue

Section

Facets of Human Existence

How to Cite

1. Tsvetkova O. Intersubjective Problem of Madness // Philosophical anthropology. 2023. № 1 (9). C. 50–61.

Similar Articles

11-20 of 73

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.