Anthropocentrism between Depression and Psychosis: Autonomy of Affect

Authors

  • Egor Dorozhkin Glinka Nizhny Novgorod Conservatoire

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21146/2414-3715-2021-7-2-171-178

Keywords:

anthropocentrism, future, subjectivity, individual, structure, affect, depression, psychosis, representation, nature

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to problematize the theme of the individual psychoemotional health of a modern person and indicate an alternative interpretation of affect. This problem is investigated not from the point of view of the individual's autonomy, but from a trans-individual perspective, in which modern depression is associated not with the problems of an individual suffering subject, but with the sociocultural situation that produces this subject. The recursiveness of the individual and society ultimately has a structural-semiotic character, mediated by representation. It is suggested that it is the affect that can serve to open up alternative ways in understanding subjective life and building new cultural practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Egor Dorozhkin, Glinka Nizhny Novgorod Conservatoire

    Senior lecturer, Department of Philosophy and Aesthetics.

    Piskunova st., 40, Nizhny Novgorod 603005, Russian Federation

Downloads

Published

2021-12-25

Issue

Section

ECHOES OF THE EVENTS

How to Cite

1. Dorozhkin E. Anthropocentrism between Depression and Psychosis: Autonomy of Affect // Philosophical anthropology. 2021. № 2 (7). C. 171–178.