Apathy

Authors

  • Alexander Stoliarov RAS Institute of Philosophy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21146/2414-3715-2023-9-1-177-190

Keywords:

apathy, nonafficiability, dispassion, inability to endure, equanimity, asceticism, antiquity, patristics, Middle Ages, New Age

Abstract

"Apathy" is a term of ancient philosophy, which was also used by representatives of patristics, medieval scholasticism and New Age philosophy. "Apathy", depending on the understanding of affectability as the ability to undergo an impact, can mean the absence of any suffering (passion, affect), immunity to this or that influence or non-subjection to it. In the broadest sense, there are two types of nonafficiability: general nonafficiability as immunity to any influence (ontological connotation), and special (spiritual) nonafficiability as immunity to passions or as freedom from passions (ethical connotation). The most common Latin equivalents of the Greek term ἀπάθεια are "impassibilitas", "tranquillitas". The article shows what shades of meaning were conveyed using these terms by ancient philosophers (pre-Socratics, Plato, Aristotle, Stoics, Neoplatonists), numerous representatives of Greek and Latin patristics, representatives of medieval philosophy (Thomas Aquinas) and New Age philosophy (Spinoza, Kant).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Alexander Stoliarov, RAS Institute of Philosophy

    DSc in Philosophy, Leading Research Fellow

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

Issue

Section

ENCYCLOPEDIC SEARCH

How to Cite

1. Stoliarov A. . Apathy // Philosophical anthropology. 2023. № 1 (9). C. 177–190.