On the Discussion of Mannerheim's Role in the War with the USSR

Authors

  • Viktor Maslov National research University Higher school of Economics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21146/2414-3715-2020-6-2-62-70

Keywords:

Mannerheim, Kollontai, Stalin, Vyshinsky, Leningrad blockade, Finland, the Second World War, Mannerheim line, Road of life, P.P. Maslov

Abstract

The article is written in the form of an essay. It examines what value for the course of the Great Patriotic War of 1941‑1945, in particular for the defense of Leningrad, had neutral-restrained position of Mannerheim and Finland as a state, expressed in relative distancing from Nazi Germany: non-participation in the storming and bombing of Leningrad, refusal to provide the German army the territory of Finland for hitting the city, to block the "Road of Life" on the lake Ladoga. It is shown that this position was largely the result of the diplomatic efforts of the Soviet Ambassador to Sweden, Alexandra Kollontai, who had a special friendly relationship with Mannerheim. In the course of the argument, along with the analysis of objective and literarily documented facts, the author also relies on personal evidence rooted in the biography of his grandfather, the famous academician P.P. Maslov. The article uses a concrete example to show how personal positions and interpersonal relationships, subject to their own logic, become important elements of historically significant factors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Viktor Maslov, National research University Higher school of Economics

    Doctor of physical and mathematical Sciences, Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, honored Professor.

    National research University Higher school of Economics.

    20 Myasnitskaya str., Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation

Downloads

Published

2020-12-30

Issue

Section

Historical Anthropology

How to Cite

1. Maslov V. On the Discussion of Mannerheim’s Role in the War with the USSR // Philosophical anthropology. 2020. № 2 (6). C. 62–70.